ecstacy wrote:Pls read the articles you actually put up.
“They are here to form a preliminary opinion on the various issues before I can confirm their appointment,” AG Amos Wako told the Sunday Nation. “I want to handle this professionally, and I want an opinion from people who have practised before the ICC. I want an informed opinion.”
The appointment criteria is there in black and white. Has any Kenyan lawyer "practised before the ICC" and beyond the credentials and "informed opinion" of these two lawyers?
Yes. Its important to read and equally important it is to understand what has been read.
Surely to support the opinion 'those who have practised before the ICC' wont they need material collected by 'those who have collected material for the ICC'? Its only logical, consistent and certainly not contradictory for the achievement of that 'informed opinion' that is so sought.
Surely what is good for the goose is also good for the gander. And vice versa......
Food for thought. Consistency, that is.