wazua Fri, Jan 31, 2025
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

3 Pages<123>
Killer strategies for trouncing the competition.
muganda
#21 Posted : Thursday, January 27, 2011 5:36:00 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 9/15/2006
Posts: 3,905
Aaah late to the Wazuazu party today... but so informative so far.

@tony stark, maybe Ariel is trying to Unleash overwhelming force but let's see how it ends. On the Nissan/Toyota issue, this is a classic curveball read next post

@Sasha agree good examples; and very good insights from @tony stark
@Intelligentsia he is right - I also know a friend who claims MPesa was stolen from him.

@gathinga thanks for MKESHO input. I wonder to what extent it reflects lack of carry through from MJ's tenure?

@Toshi suspended terror smile

@Ric dess I think this discussion falls squarely on Porters competitive rivalry in the market. Innovation is covered by threat of substitutes but Hardball/Curveballs are competitive rivalry.


@mukiha introduced thus: [i]Winners in business play rough and don't apologize for it. Softball players, by contrast, may look good - report decent earnings and favourable press - but they aren't intensely serious about winning.

So the answer is winning - market share, profit, accolade. The 'killer' here is just a literary device.


ON TO CURVEBALLS...
muganda
#22 Posted : Thursday, January 27, 2011 5:38:04 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 9/15/2006
Posts: 3,905
CURVEBALLS
After 2 years, one of the authors of Hardball, feeling misunderstood after his first article which seemed to imply playing dirty or mean - not true - authored Curveballs.

Hardball is getting rough and tough with the competition.
Curveball is a strategy that fools them to do something dumb that they otherwise wouldn't have done; or not to do something smart that they otherwise would have done.

So the recommended curveball strategies:
1. Draw your rival out of the profit zone
When Barclays and SCB were kingpins, SCB starts pursuing efficient banking model to serve up-market shutting down branches everywhere. Barclays follows, without too much thought yet their profits came from the more middle class customer.

2. Let Rivals Misinterpret your Success
Is it fair to say Uchumi misinterpreted Nakumatt's rapid growth? It seemed the answer was mega stores with everything (furniture, wheelbarrows, cars) in them. And go after them Uchumi did buying land everywhere, building bigger prettier warehouse stores, and rounding up all the inventory a household would dream of. But they overlooked the secret, that Nakumat was like a mall - they owned no assets!


3. Employ unfamilar techniques
Classic one is when Zain launched Vuka across network tarrif of 8.00/= for first time in Kenya. Safaricom was so surprised that they launched Mpaka Che - tarrif for prostitutes, crooks, and watchmen - much to the indignation of loyal subscribers.


4. Disguise your Success
Heaven knows why Unilever decided in 1998 to sell its seed crushing plant to a little known Thika firm, run by two brothers and their father, known as Bidco - Who the hell was Bidco? Unilever must have been happy getting rid of this brand, not knowing how successful Bidco had become. In the year prior to this sale, Bidco had expanded its capacity by 500%. And soon it was Elianto, Kimbo, and entire edible oils category of Unilever; before it became hygiene products and margarines under threat!


5. Stick rivals with Unprofitable Customers
For years, Safaricom made about 7% of its money from Postpaid customers. They were few, pickier, with bargaining power, and very demanding. And surprisingly often postpaid customer rued how all promos or campaigns seemed to overlook them.
Many a postpaid account KQ/Coke furiously marched out of Safaricom to the competitor, but heck how much did they change the fortunes of Zain?

mukiha
#23 Posted : Friday, January 28, 2011 8:43:04 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/27/2008
Posts: 4,114
It is not always desirable to be the market leader... Xerox worked overtime trying to get people to stop calling "photocopying" 'xeroxing"! The habit presents annoying legal issues... can you really claim to own a generic name? Ask Coca-Cola what they think about anyone making this-cola and that-cola [the drink is made from Kola-nut extracts - Coca-Cola invented the spelling with a C ]

Right here at home, market leaders in especially in FMCG have a big problem dealing with counterfeit. Not so long ago some one complained about poor quality TOSS detergent - he was told he must have bought a fake package!

I guess that's why Bidco doesn't want to own a market leader brand: They control over 50% of the cooking fat segment [by my estimation], but none of their brands is a market leader. That way, counterfeiters don't know which one to copy... but Bodco still rakes in the money.

Same can be said about CMC; even though counterfeiting a car is a little more difficult...
Nothing is real unless it can be named; nothing has value unless it can be sold; money is worthless unless you spend it.
gathinga
#24 Posted : Friday, January 28, 2011 10:40:55 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 11/30/2006
Posts: 635
Toshi wrote:
Zain vs. Safaricon - real application of Henry Kissinger's "Mad Dog" Theory. Louis IV used the same tact; they've caused a few ripples, they've created suspended terror. Who knows what they'll do next?
@


seems Airtel's strategy is to WIPE OUT ALL COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES OF SAFCOM. Basically;
(1)redistribute subscriber numbers by pushing for double sim onwership (2)cut of safcom fiancial muscle buy ruthlessly slashing margins so Safcom investment plan in new technologies gets slowed down and so is its ability to pay high wages to staffers (3)cut into subscriber loyaty by branding safcom as the expensive operator.

Airtel must have figured that after wiping out the competitive advantage of their rivals, then everyone in the industry will be on the same footing and the race starts again.

From indicatins, Airtel might just succeed in cutting off the competitive advantages of safcom. But will they win the race when it starts a second time. Orange could as well run with it
Kwanini
#25 Posted : Friday, January 28, 2011 11:14:45 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 1/28/2009
Posts: 353
Location: Cloud
@muganda, heeeei!! u sound so much like a certain marketing lecturer ? too good.
"For i am the master and the captain of my fate"
amga
#26 Posted : Saturday, January 29, 2011 9:49:30 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 8/16/2010
Posts: 149
Location: hapa Kenya
Intelligentsia wrote:
"let not this thread die, its very enlightening,again thanks muganda!
tony, its the first time am hearing of the microfinance thingy and safcon and somehow i doubt it"

yes its true how best to try a mass market product than use faulu and DFID which sponsored the entire thing
KenyanLyrics
#27 Posted : Sunday, January 30, 2011 12:55:16 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 4/16/2010
Posts: 906
Location: Nairobi
From my experience, you can run yourself into the ground trying to sabotage the competition. Striving to be the best is much more fun
JkMwatha
#28 Posted : Sunday, January 30, 2011 3:27:50 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 9/11/2007
Posts: 816
'Society' taught me that I have to get a good education and "do something" with my life, so I blindly engage in educational and self development programs and activities, and then sit back and wait for my reward to come.

And so I wait. Then wait some more. When I’m done waiting, I wait a little longer.

What happens? Nothing! Absolutely nothing...... ABK!

Discussion above relates to mainly large organisation..... but let me give it a shot.

I acquire a small business… a bar. Small bar in an area where there are several other bars. Bigger pubs/bars. More established ‘bar & restaurants’.

My small bar does not even have space to set up a kitchen… but I can probably out source food from Kamande's butchery-come-nyama-choma joint nearby.

The bar+sitting area is not exactly spacious… but a few large mirrors seem to do a trick.

Very few customers…. mainly my relas & friends (out of pity)consume 1 or 2 crates on average per day during these tough 'Mututho days'.

What killer strategies could I use to trounce the competition?
erifloss
#29 Posted : Sunday, January 30, 2011 8:06:09 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 6/21/2010
Posts: 514
Location: Nairobi
What i've come to learn over the years is that the only way of outwitting a competitor is by creating an illusion of 'beneficial partnership' eabl did it to castle, google to yahoo, venture capitalists, goldman sachs on lehmann, US to Iraq & Afghanistan and so many other companies and countries do the same....
'They say money cannot buy me happiness but when i compare when i had none and now, i'm happier' Kevin O'leary
thuks
#30 Posted : Sunday, January 30, 2011 10:13:16 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 10/8/2008
Posts: 1,575
Why is KTB not using one of this colourful strategies to market Kenya while one of the pharaohs are down ? I wonder what some fellows are paid to dosmile
I care!
Toshi
#31 Posted : Monday, January 31, 2011 9:21:12 AM
Rank: Member


Joined: 3/11/2009
Posts: 38
KenyanLyrics wrote:
From my experience, you can run yourself into the ground trying to sabotage the competition. Striving to be the best is much more fun


I agree with you, to an extent. I suggest you read the book "Small Giants" by Bo Burlingham, for an interesting perspective on companies that focus on greatness versus growth; intensity. You may have a smaller market share but your market strategy sucks more $$ from your clients. Operate 'light', on a smaller scale but highly profitable. I guess it depends on how you look at it; Brains vs Brawn?
Possession of material riches, without inner peace, is like dying of thirst while bathing in a lake.
Sasha
#32 Posted : Monday, January 31, 2011 10:27:12 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 9/5/2007
Posts: 627
My lecturer in school used to tell us that strategy formulation need not be an arduous task. He said that the best strategies were formulated without any pressure and were advised by the simplest things in life.

@Ric dees: Although the Porter's five forces are a good analytical tool, they cannot be used in isolation as they have a number of limitations. Neither can any other analytical tool e.g. Ansoff's matrix, SWOT analysis.

I'm more inclined to think that if a company adopts one of Porter's Generic strategies e.g. cost leadership, differentiation or focus strategies, they can kill the competition effectively. You look around and see so many companies 'stuck in the middle' of offering a cheap but unique product!

Like mukiha says, many companies do not want to be market leaders. They are happy to be market players, only with a say in the market dynamics. The example of EAI and Bidco is very appropriate for this case.

@JkMwatha: For your bar, you first need to determine what you want, to beat your competition (i.e. more customers and more profits despite your capacity challenges) or kill the competition! To beat the competition, you need VAS for the consumers e.g prettier waitresses, bigger TVs, free bitings, clean loos etc. To kill competition, do what Bharti Airtel is doing!
tony stark
#33 Posted : Monday, January 31, 2011 12:19:22 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 7/8/2008
Posts: 947
@JKMwatha you have introduced a great perspective to this thread.
How do all this strategies work for SMEs?
Your example of a bar is very interesting. Creating customer loyalty and locking out your competitors. Several bars have attempted to use member exclusivity to market themselves eg Q and guessing for the period this bar has been in existence it seems to work for them.
Another example is marketing and advertising through social media such as facebook. Tamasha is a good example of a bar that uses facebook to announce events, create theme nights and get feedback from their clients. Facebook is an inexpensive marketing tool.

Failed strategies would be Kengeles and their rapid expansion through franchising and opening new branches. The themes worked for a while and there was always a kengeles near you.

As a bar it would be near impossible to kill of competition and all you can do is increase your market share and profits. The manufacturer of the alcohol definitely do not want a bar or string of bars to be dominant since that will give that bar/string of bars to much power in negotiating with the manufacturer(s).
Wendz
#34 Posted : Monday, January 31, 2011 2:05:45 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/19/2008
Posts: 4,268
@JK

Thats a good perspective because our economy is actually being driven by the SMEs. For small businesses, their main strategies would be what you would call the 'soft strategies" as listed by @sasha.... If you look at some of the big corporate organisations eg equity bank, that's how they penetrated the market. the "big boys" tend to ignore the small players. In your example of the bar, you could also add onto Sasha's list efficient services, personalised services(club like) because you have a small clientele, the sort of music played, clean environment, friendly services etc. You realise that most of the small businesses grow from word of mouth.

Sometimes head-on competition can run you out of business.... or leave you limping. Ask kuguru.... he did not even come close to what keroche is mainly because he went head-on with coca-cola too early.... keroche started in the "bush" and its only when it started nibbling into the giant's territories (brown bottles and malts) that we got to recognize its existence....by this time, EABL had ignored it for quiet a long time until it became a force that needed to be dealt with - same as what happened to emergence of EB vs SCB/BBK.

Sometimes its best to have your business right next to your competitors mainly because of the added advantage. Good example is hardwares and spareshop businesses... you dont want your shop to be on its own even if it seems like the 'better option' to minimize competition. for such businesses you want to be in the middle of the competition. As long as there is no outright market leader, rivalry is low and may be thats why we do not have many examples for SMEs in a topic like this.

Bottomline is, the strategy you intend to employ in your pursuit of higher market share/profits is majorly dictated by your competition.
McReggae
#35 Posted : Monday, January 31, 2011 3:24:54 PM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 6/17/2008
Posts: 23,365
Location: Nairobi
Nokia Vs Apple,
Apple has less than 10% market share on sale of handsets yet Apple matched it in terms of profits!!!!
..."Wewe ni mtu mdogo sana....na mwenye amekuandika pia ni mtu mdogo sana!".
Toshi
#36 Posted : Monday, January 31, 2011 4:38:59 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 3/11/2009
Posts: 38
@McReggae, spot-on!
Possession of material riches, without inner peace, is like dying of thirst while bathing in a lake.
JkMwatha
#37 Posted : Tuesday, February 01, 2011 12:22:44 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 9/11/2007
Posts: 816
Thanks @Wendz-T.stark-Sasha

Very useful info.

That bar example is indeed de facto (or at least comparable)
.... only that I wish I owned it.
Intelligentsia
#38 Posted : Tuesday, February 01, 2011 10:29:00 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 10/1/2009
Posts: 2,436
u want to run a successful business. Do you:

1) study failed businesses and their causes of failure so that you
deliberately avoid the same pitfalls that did them in,

2) study successful businesses and what makes them successful so
that u adopt same?
muganda
#39 Posted : Wednesday, February 02, 2011 9:31:53 AM
Rank: Elder


Joined: 9/15/2006
Posts: 3,905
@JkMwatha, just to add to all the good insights thus far; important to realize all the big companies with 'right strategy' were once small 'dukas' - yes even EABL, Vodafone, Coca-Cola, the lot!

Now for the bar, very important to differentiate - something that sets you apart or only your bar is known for. The kind of thing customers go, you know what I like about that place...


@Intelligentsia BOTH:
I always thought it wise to learn from others mistakes - saves so much hustle - studying failures covers this issue. Now 'nothing new under the sun' so only prudent to learn and improve what the best have done - study successes.

Sasha
#40 Posted : Wednesday, February 02, 2011 10:01:58 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 9/5/2007
Posts: 627
@Intelligentsia: As much as I agree with muganda, it really depends on the industry you are joining. If the industry has huge underutilised potential e.g. cable TV industry, then you are better of looking at failed businesses. Here you have GTV as a good example.

Where the industry is bustling with competition and diminishing profitability, e.g. outdoor advertising, megastores etc., you would look at successful companies and try to adopt their strategy but at the same time unleashing your own competitive advantage. See Magnate Ventures and Nakumatt-Tuskys-Naivas.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (8)
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2025 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.