Ofcoz they will find a way to stamp travel ban on him if need be and its not ony usa,once usa does that UK follows and then the rest of europe does the same,cause they normally send a circular to all the missions. But they dont say until he does apply that when he will know. Murungaru faced the same music he thought it was only usa that has banned him,he tried uk and he was told NO,then belgium only to realise he is banned in the entire european union! Life is like an onion; you peel off one layer at a time and sometimes you weep. Carl Sandburg

What are you guys happy about? ____ Seems u supported kifaki or impunity. ____mnutula & ka-loser will support their paychecks. kalonzo is getting a effing 380mn house??? While my poor ass is taxed to the max? My electricity bill has a VAT tag while those bastards drive fuel guzzlers? Greedy when others are fearful,Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase WB

sorry guys to rain on your parade but the US ambassador is spot on and in tune with majority of kenyans regarding ringera and corruption! you see,african politicians like mutula are funny. they don't want the mzungu/mkoloni to interfere in our lives,yet our pathetic govts ran to them with their begging bowls when hunger comes knocking due to their poorly executed policies and rampant corruption! we also go kissing the mzungu boots to come and intervene when fellow kenyans are busy killing,looting and raping after disputed elections. the fact is kibaki ignored the public mood by unilaterally reapointing the very incompetent ringera who has not done absolutely nothing to dismantle the intricate webs of corruption networks so prevalent in govt and public sector. most kenyans want ringera out and so does obama who has vested interest in the well being of this nation! am afraid but hate or love them,the american admin is right! bY aNy MeAns NecEsSaRy.....

This ambassador may say all he wishes but the very least he should do if he is to get the respect of Kenyans is to verify facts first instead of relying on what politicians and half-baked lawyers are yapping about. Three things are in issue here and the problem is that they are being conflated so as to confuse matters: 1.Is the re-appointment illegal? 2.Has Ringera performed? 3.Ringera's remuneration On the first issue,it is abundantly clear that there is nothing illegal with the re-appointment. Under the Anti-Corruption ... Act,it is only the initial appointment that requires parlimentary approval. Those shouting loudest on this point should read the letter of the law first. On the issue of perfomance,it is obvious that the hindrance to the work of KACA is the fact that it has no prosecutorial powers. Wako is sitting on various files on which the KACA has recommended prosecutions. In those instances where prosecutions have been commenced they are all bogged down before the judiciary. Public perception of corruption levels in the country is not a sufficient criteria for assessing Ringera's performance. On the issue of the 2.5 million salary - this should be reduced and the head of KACA ought to receive no more than the Chief Justice,the AG or other equivalent offices.

What an intelligent reply by Mutula: Just shut up...... While the country drifts into mediocrity we defend ourselves by saying just shut up. Standard 2? Business opportunities are like buses,there's always another one coming