For Sport wrote: These ujamaaish ideas will suppress progress.
This is not RAO 32/72 poor man's rich man's maize meal. Here you are quite wrong my friend. Even the best of "free market economist" will not agree with you. Government should play a hand in directing the market in three areas to guarantee economic growth.
1. When a competing nation offers subsidies to its manufacturers or farmers, our government should do the same to offset the consequences at home as the market has been warped.
2. In times of war, the government should shape market policies particularly not trading with adversaries.
3. In education of the youth, as this is the only way an economy/nation can really "invest" and guarantee the sustainability of the investement. (NOTE, not in the scope of public healthcare, provision of water and other public infrastructure issues e.t.c)
Others can be arguably left to the "invisible hand"
I think this step is driven by sound economic theory and i can see the presidents hand in this. Kibaki has proven time and again that he understands the key economic issues(remember the global cheer for Kenya's free primary education?) The idea here is not competition for space between the rich and poor but a second step from free primary education towards ensuring a wider reach of good education to the countries youth particularly the poor. It is absurd to punish a poor child for life on the most important aspect of personal development which is in turn key for national economic development. You have to remember that this acts as a subsidy to the poor youth (an investment in the countries manpower), the rich already have options including the likes of Strathmore and precious blood which will grow with the wealth of the country. Further, private education institutions need to develop upwards, currently they are underfunded (private universities). This is not communism/socialism e.t.c it is very sound economic policy.
Ras Kienyeji Man