@Bashka
I picked this issue because it happened to headline the newsprint today.
I do not agree with you when you say that it is up to the Muslims to decide whether to have it in the national constitution or not. This is a national constitution and every small bit affects us equally. Imagine if the Kikuyus or Luhyas decide to entrench circumcision because it only affects their community?
By the way,as someone asked what do the Muslims have to lose be not having the courts entrenched?

Bright and interesting people talk about ideas.
Those of average intelligence talk about things.
Stupid people talk about other people.

But seriously,if it is in the current constitution,and it has not affected us all these years,really????? Arent other issues like customs of different communities (eg customary marriages laws etc) not also entrenched in the constitution? Muslim marriages for example do not fall under any 'customary' marriages should we nullify them once we remove that clause from the constitution or how are such things supposed to be captured?

Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want.

@ wendz- i totally agree with u. These courts have been here with us even be4 i was born na hazijani-affect in any way . But i still beg to ask our muslim brothers a question? Entrenced in the katiba or not,u are still kenyans free to practice ua religion vile munaifeel as long as u do not intefere with other peoples rights.sawa. Then why are u really insisting on this? is it ego driven. infact u are the ones who need to explain to us why these courts must be entrenced and not the other way!

@ wendz

i am with you on this....

When you run so fast to get somewhere,you miss the fun of getting there... Life is not a race,so take it slowly....

Pliz forgive my ignorance,If these courts are not in our supreme constitution,then ziko wapi?