hi all,
looks like the ICC saga is getting rather interesting, why?
According to the master flip floper, the PMpig,..."...the ICC should not just investigate those who are suspected of planning the violence but also those behind the bungled election which led to the mayhem."...the vagabond is putting a hanging rope noose on his fragile neck, how silly!!!..and hey the elections and criminal activities that were committed were two separate and distinct entities!!
According to wiper...."....“I know that ICC goes for people who bear the highest responsibilities and I expect the court to go for such people. I also expect the court will not apply double standards....". a perfect case of an oscillating pendulum..today an angel tommorow an imp!!!
According to the all-the-time-smile-at-nothing-toothy Anthony Genius..."...Waki Commission was not sure whether there was enough evidence to meet the threshold required by the ICC or whether the evidence it had collected and which was part of the Waki report was enough and that the Waki Commission had recommended further investigations into the violence as it did not have sufficient confidence in its report..." why was the report accepted at the Hague if it did not meet the ICC threshold requirements??? Why was the prosecutor moreno ocampo granted the go ahead by the three judges at the Hague to investigate the PEV based on the submitted evidence in waki report???
According to Rutos lawyers...."...we have identified six other coached witnesses who said they were ready to recant their statements in the coming days and are on witness protection programme in neighbouring Tanzania. we also spent a couple of days in Tanzania last week, trying to establish contact with the said witnesses"....WTF!!! i thought the actual locations of these protected witnesses is supposed to be a top secret!!!
According to some other suspects lawyer...."...we are intending or considering filing a case before the judges at The Hague seeking to stop the prosecution altogether...." haven't these guys ran out of time already? if they manage to present their papers in the two weeks window, based on the strong evidence against the suspects do they stand a chance to convince the judges?
According to ocampo...."....We are not investigating the elections. We are not analysing the political responsibilities. We are not making in judgment on the political parties. We are investigating the murders, rapes, forced displacements, which constitute crimes against humanity
"....aint this the bare truth?
ocampo is clear on his future intentions. in our local scene it seems that the affected characters are running helta skelta with their usual local politicking and sympathy searching...
the question is who is fooling who?
...besides, the presence of a safe alone does not signify that there is money inside...