wazua Sat, Mar 21, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

3 Pages<123>
Nissan Xtrail
JkMwatha
#11 Posted : Friday, October 22, 2010 6:37:20 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 9/11/2007
Posts: 816
Considering resale value when buying a car is smart thinking.

This is obviously different from buying a TV, a fridge or a loaf of bread.

quicksand
#12 Posted : Saturday, October 23, 2010 1:16:26 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 7/5/2010
Posts: 2,061
Location: Nairobi
JkMwatha wrote:
Considering resale value when buying a car is smart thinking.

This is obviously different from buying a TV, a fridge or a loaf of bread.



@JkMwatha - I see your logic and there is no harm in that. I do a bit differently, I apportion my investments funds, liquid cash and future strategies to a different account; When buying a car, I consider it an expense, for my personal use and convenience and FORGET about its original (soon to deteriorate) value. Thus the only consideration then is availability and cost of parts, service, its utility and reliability. But thats me.

Let me pose this question. If you acquired a house (to live in - very key) in a nice neighbourhood, say South C, for about 14 mill, and then after some 3-4 years the value jumps to 22 mill, would you sell the house and consider the 8 mill profit, knowing you could never get a similar house in a similar location for the old price?
Intelligentsia
#13 Posted : Monday, October 25, 2010 10:39:52 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 10/1/2009
Posts: 2,436
have driven the X-Trail and Harrier.
Harrier anytime - picks up fast, good mileage if car well-maintained,parts fairly well-priced pia.
Cardinal
#14 Posted : Monday, October 25, 2010 10:46:14 AM
Rank: Member

Joined: 5/12/2009
Posts: 266
Intelligentsia wrote:
have driven the X-Trail and Harrier.
Harrier anytime - picks up fast, good mileage if car well-maintained,parts fairly well-priced pia.



Very true.

Harrier/Lexus is much more superior.
Mpenzi
#15 Posted : Monday, October 25, 2010 12:04:04 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 10/17/2008
Posts: 1,234
Cardinal wrote:
Intelligentsia wrote:
have driven the X-Trail and Harrier.
Harrier anytime - picks up fast, good mileage if car well-maintained,parts fairly well-priced pia.



Very true.

Harrier/Lexus is much more superior.


No need to compare mangoes and oranges - Harrier is much more expensive than the Xtrail.
Intelligentsia
#16 Posted : Monday, October 25, 2010 4:36:59 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 10/1/2009
Posts: 2,436
@Mpenzi - old shape Harrier (a cross-over SUV) and X-Trail are more or less in the same league. It is the new shape Harrier/Lexus that is way way out of the class of the Nissan X-Trail.
sheep
#17 Posted : Tuesday, October 26, 2010 10:21:14 AM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 7/24/2008
Posts: 781
there is no way you can compare harrier and xtrail..ata ile harrier mzee iko mbele tu sana...BTW those CRSP values of xtrail are way too overinflated...what is KRA upto?
The utimate goal of investing is to buy low sell high;if we re-write this core equation in psychology terms it becomes buy fear sell greed.
gicharu
#18 Posted : Tuesday, October 26, 2010 12:11:21 PM
Rank: New-farer

Joined: 3/29/2010
Posts: 14
Location: Nairobi
I own a 2003 Nissan X-Trail (ST 2.0 non Turbo). The consumption is 12.5 km per litre of petrol.

It picks very well and is enjoyable to drive. I think it is unwise to compare X-Trail with Lexus/ Harrier. Harrier is superior but it also costs Kshs. 1m more than the X-Trail. (Note: 2003 X-Trail Costs about Kshs. 1.3m and Lexus Harrier (2003) costs about Kshs. 2.3m.

Resale value of an X-Trail is definitely low and I knew it before importing mine. I doubt there is a car that does not depreciate after usage.. I have seen countless Toyota Prados being sold at Kshs. 1.2m .. KAYs, KAZs and the original purchase value was about ksh. 2.7m

Thanks.

Gicharu
tuvok
#19 Posted : Tuesday, October 26, 2010 12:27:49 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 5/2/2007
Posts: 536
Kluger and Harrier share a couple of engines. (except the 3.5L engine)
Comparing a Harrier/Lexus/Kluger to a X-Trail is abit off, as they are not in the same classification of cars. Harrier may could be compared to pathfinder or highlander for toyotas. Rav4 to X-Trail (to Forester, CRV and other compact SUVs) would be more accurate.

@gicharu .. that fuel consumption stat - quite impressive especially for a 2L 150hp 4x4. Is this town or highway (or both) driving?


Cardinal
#20 Posted : Tuesday, October 26, 2010 1:25:26 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 5/12/2009
Posts: 266
tuvok wrote:
Kluger and Harrier share a couple of engines. (except the 3.5L engine)
Comparing a Harrier/Lexus/Kluger to a X-Trail is abit off, as they are not in the same classification of cars. Harrier may could be compared to pathfinder or highlander for toyotas. Rav4 to X-Trail (to Forester, CRV and other compact SUVs) would be more accurate.

@gicharu .. that fuel consumption stat - quite impressive especially for a 2L 150hp 4x4. Is this town or highway (or both) driving?





Tuvok, did you acquire the Subaru Outback that you wanted?
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.