jk2010x wrote:The corruption ridden kenyan justice system is suddenly saying that Ruto should probably be jailed over the 96 Million case.
Ruto who was charged way back had moved the Constitutional Court to stay his being charged claiming his Constitutional right was being infringed by the charge. The Constitutional Court finally rules on that and says that he should stand trial. So where do you get the 'justice system is suddenly saying that Ruto should probably be jailed' from?
jk2010x wrote:I think this is comical at best.
You are comical. At the very least.
jk2010x wrote:The current kenyan justice system is too rotten and has no moral authority to handle any corruption case.Where is anglo leasing? where is goldenberg??
Eureka! So because other corrupt individuals have not been charged nobody should be? Why not do away with the whole justice system then and let everyone be the judge and executioner?
jk2010x wrote:It is obviously clear that the justice system is being abused to score political goals-and the main basis is the fact that there have been many more corruption cases before and no one has ever been found guilty.
Obvious to you maybe but not from where am sitting. So if no one has ever been found guilty it means that charging anybody with corruption is an abuse of the justice system?
Are you alright?
jk2010x wrote:Further, ruto, is not just an ordinary individual-he is a king of his ethnic nation and attempting to "finish" him will evoke a political reaction that may be much more costlier to the country.His community is his insurance against any local jail( a hague jail is a different cup of tea though).Keep reading..
With respect this argument reminds me of some stuff that if it were to be mined would be found on your Southern ends. Luckily that stuff is all yours.
He who can express in words the ardour of his love, has but little love to express. - Petrach, Son. (That men by various ways arrive at the same end. - Montaigne, The Essays of.)