Sasha wrote:I've gone through the report and I have to agree with mwanahisa and muganda. It is not representative of the countrywide figures as alluded.
But I think HassConsult are onto something big here. They will definately need to collaborate with other developers and agents to collate this info into something worth investing in. Considering the dearth of info on real estate, I believe there are many people, me included who would be willing to part with some Kshs to access this info!
I see the average rent for Kitengela is higher than for South C! Really?
@Sasha and also Mwanahisa - you both think the figures for Buru Buru and South C are unjustifiably lower than Kitengela (or Thika). If these are average figures, from an SQ/bedsitter to a maisonnet (or even a grand mansion like we sometimes see in Thika or Kitengela), then I would agree. Areas like Thika town and Kitengela are mainly (not exclusively) for the driving working class who mostly commute to Nairobi - these areas are not littered with bedsitters/SQs for rent and typically sit on more than an eighth an acre vis a vis the smaller plots in Buru and South B which, owing to landlords building extensions and letting out, house small dwellings whose rent brings down the average. I agree Kitengela and Thika also have small houses but not as many bedsitters/SQs being leased.
If you take a typical 4 bedroom in South C - attracting rent of 40-45k (or Buru at 35-40k) - then add it to an SQ/Bedsitter attracting 5-8k, then we see the math getting distorted. Then look at the density (the number to derive the average) and it gets even worse.
So, in Kitengela/Thika, there are fewer dwellings per square kilometre. And lets remember Kitengela and Thika are whole towns whereas South C and Buru Buru are estates.