Horton wrote:VituVingiSana wrote:Horton wrote:http://www.nse.co.ke/newsite/pdf/Year%202010/Announcements/KenolKobil%20October.pdf
Poor show from KK. There is a stick to your guns and there is this. They were in a lose lose situation and dragged this thing on unnecessarily. I think heads should roll for this bubu as I'm sure they lost a lot more than 600m in lost business during the dispute.
I made my cash and got out. Now only holding onto 100k shares residual.
Chief, unavuta nini?
KShs 600mn in SALES is not KShs 600mn in CASH or KShs 600mn in PROFITS...
KK may have lost sales of KShs 600mn but the gains in PROFIT is KShs 600mn (less costs)...
@vvs, thanks or the basic buy sell and profit philosophy. However, my point was due to loss of business by not paying the 600m ie not in the loop during the 2 month period, running out of stocks, paying a premium to other sources for fuel, missing out on the OTS action, must have had a significant impact on KK bottom-line. Not sure what you are on about sir.
Not 600mn worth... KK made 1.17bn in 1H 2010 so I doubt KK 'lost' profits of 600mn in 2 months!
- KK stations had fuel for most of the 2 months. When they did not, others (except NOCK) seemed to be out as well
- KK might have paid a premium for the fuel but they also charged more. At best a loss of sales + margin but not close to 600mn.
- OTS is competitive. The recent winner has always been the politically connected Gulf Energy. Even Shell stayed out. BTW, KK has been an active importer in Tanzania for Zambia + Burundi + Rwanda
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett