Caveman wrote:Elder wrote:This Adult-Love for Safaricom is really embarrassing. While at it why not just open a Makmende/Chuck Norris/Jack Baur thread on Safaricom and Michael Joseph because these two are all knowing and all seeing.
Some years back in my Philosophy class, there was a definition of what an (valid)argument is. @Elder: you remind me of two fallacies to an argument:
Denying the antecedent &
Straw man fallacies.Please make me understand where 'Makmende/Chuck Norris/Jack Baur' feature in a 3G - 4G vis-a-vis market. Don't upset your name
Ng'ai! You went to a Philosphy class? My philosophy exposure started and ended with
"Sophie's World: A Novel About the History of Philosophy" in class 7. I mean I think
'War and Peace' is a Russian Bible. No wonder I can't get what you mean by those 'Aunty Cedar' and 'Strawberry' things.
Caveman wrote:This is what Celtel said when Safaricom was doing trials and later launching their 3G network. They thought it was a waste of resources and a show of 'Kitambi'.They are now crying that there is a 3G service monopoly in Kenya. Did I hear someone say 'there is no 4G market in Kenya?' Lets all agree that Safaricom wanaona mbele.
But with all those deep thinking I find it strange that you cannot see the connection between my reference to Makmende et al and your statement that 'Lets all agree that Safaricom wanaona mbele' moreso in context of your naive justification for 3G in Kenya. Or is spoon feeding necessary?
He who can express in words the ardour of his love, has but little love to express. - Petrach, Son. (That men by various ways arrive at the same end. - Montaigne, The Essays of.)