A quick read of the latest Monthly Economic Review for August 2010 is most perplexing. You don't have to be an economist to realize the numbers are all confusing, but just be able to apply simple maths.
The debt to gdp ratio involves comparing the public debt figure to the GDP figure at market prices. Using the data on pages 5 & 39 of the document we can see that GDP market prices was Ksh2,274 bn in 2009 while the public debt was Ksh1,115 bn. So the debt to gdp ratio should be 49.0% in Dec-09 and not the 45.1% officially stated.
In any case these differences may be due to some error or funny standard applied, we'll never know for sure. One thing that we do know know is that page 39 tells us that the country's public debt rose 13% from Ksh1,114.5 bn to KSh1,263.7 bn from Dec-09 to Aug-10 while the debt to gdp ratio reportedly rose from 45.1% to 51.2%.
First thing is first, simple maths will tell you that based on those figures GDP is FALLING...eehhh? Lastly using the govt figures of debt (1,115) and the given ratio (45.1%) for Dec-09, shouldn't GDP be Ksh2,471 bn (by simple maths) and not Ksh2,274 bn officially reported?
Can one really trust these figures?
http://www.centralbank.g...ublications/default.aspx“We are the middle children of history man, no purpose or place. We have no great war, no great depression. Our great war is a spiritual war, our great depression is our lives!" – Tyler Durden