wazua Mon, Dec 23, 2024
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

5 Pages<1234>»
Effective duration and Convexity of bonds
Scubidu
#21 Posted : Friday, August 20, 2010 2:41:42 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 9/4/2009
Posts: 700
Location: Nairobi
@emlyn. Got some stats on trading of corporate bonds trading at the NSE in 2010.

KenGen is the most vibrant off course. Traded about 4.8 billion since the start of 2010 and it's yields have dropped from 12.58% last year to 8%-9% now.
FXD (CFC Stanbic) 2009/7Yr made 2 trades at 8.5% and 11.9% for 82 million each.
Barclays FXD (MTN)2008/7Yr traded 300,000 at at 11.5% (1 trade).
FXD (Safaricom) 2009/5Yr 5 traded 200 million at 9% (1 trade).

There seems to be an issue of liquidity. I heard Nakumatt have some sort of MTN for 11%, though I can't confirm it. But it would be nice if one could get a hold of CFC's senior notes especially considering how useless the bank is. I wouldn't want to hold anything else in it.
“We are the middle children of history man, no purpose or place. We have no great war, no great depression. Our great war is a spiritual war, our great depression is our lives!" – Tyler Durden
emlyn ngwiri
#22 Posted : Friday, August 20, 2010 3:56:26 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 8/12/2010
Posts: 129
Location: nairobi
@Scubidu,the traded yield is 8.5% and the total amount traded as of 2.8.2010 was sh 82,300,000. indeed being in the seniro tranche would guarantee returns incase of 'default' but being in the subordinated tranche means higher returns with appropriate higher risk(floating rate applies).

the economy generally has not been too broadening in that the economy seems not to grow. in this respect being in the senior tranche would be good factoring in the external 'pest' factors (incorporating the inflation aspect)
Scubidu
#23 Posted : Monday, August 23, 2010 3:05:07 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 9/4/2009
Posts: 700
Location: Nairobi
@scooby. No mention of bond valuation in the BD article below:

http://www.businessdaily.../-/9iu47fz/-/index.html

They just mention one-off disposals in bond portfolios. We discussed this in an earlier post. Are they missing something? Looking at the corporate banks NIC, DTBK, CFC and even I&M shows a large bulk of bonds under tradable assets by Q1. Are these classified under unrealized gains if they're based on valuation?

@emlyn. Sorry but I assume that the senior tranche has some sort of security. But given the changes in the group, restructuring, is the senior tranche secured against the assets of the bank or the group?
“We are the middle children of history man, no purpose or place. We have no great war, no great depression. Our great war is a spiritual war, our great depression is our lives!" – Tyler Durden
Scooby
#24 Posted : Monday, August 23, 2010 4:47:52 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 9/2/2006
Posts: 121
Hi Scubidu,

If the banks are holding the bonds are trading assets, then any gain or loss that they make will be reflected in the income statement.

When you have a moment, look at Scangroup's results. They also hold an infrastructure bond as an available for sale investment. For that, they are booking their unrealised gains/losses through their balance sheet. However, when they decide to sell the bond, the cumulative gains/losses are transferred to the income statement as they are now realised.

@emlyn, the issue of tranches does not apply to the senior and suboridnated debts for CfC. That concept applies to asset backed securities.

If my memory serves me right, the CfC bond was an unsecured senior debt. That means that should the bank decide to go under, the bond holders would have a higher probability of receiving their dues compared to other types of creditors.

Lastly, the KenGen bond is a callable bond. For the first two years, it is a straight vanilla bond i.e. you receive interest and the principal remains the same. After two years, KenGen will start to redeem the principal in sixteen equal instalments for the next eight years

Regards
Sasha
#25 Posted : Monday, August 23, 2010 5:18:45 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 9/5/2007
Posts: 627
Great discussion guys. A lot of info to digest.

About a week ago, I was in an impromptu discourse with a politician who is targeting a Senate seat. The guy is a highly training Finance expert and he implied that should he win that seat, he would try and orchestrate Kenya's first municipal. I chuckled at the thought but then it dawned on me how such a municipal would benefit the county of interest. But then, would it have any takers? With the current aversion to politics, can Kenyans trust a politician with their money?

South Africa and India have a booming market for municipals. Many US states and scandinavian cities have been built using municipals. Can Kenya?
kizee
#26 Posted : Monday, August 23, 2010 5:41:59 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 1/9/2008
Posts: 537
[quote=Sasha]Great discussion guys. A lot of info to digest.

About a week ago, I was in an impromptu discourse with a politician who is targeting a Senate seat. The guy is a highly training Finance expert and he implied that should he win that seat, he would try and orchestrate Kenya's first municipal. I chuckled at the thought but then it dawned on me how such a municipal would benefit the county of interest. But then, would it have any takers? With the current aversion to politics, can Kenyans trust a politician with their money?

South Africa and India have a booming market for municipals. Many US states and scandinavian cities have been built using municipals. Can Kenya?[/quot

btw how will these run under new dispensation? will we still hav kajoras in which case wud u buy debt from an institution run by a kajora?
kizee
#27 Posted : Monday, August 23, 2010 5:43:55 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 1/9/2008
Posts: 537
kwanza how much infrustructure growth has been funded by the various IFBS issued by CBK? apart from 1bn on thika road(IFB1) anyone know?
Scooby
#28 Posted : Monday, August 23, 2010 6:36:42 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 9/2/2006
Posts: 121
@ Kizee and Sasha,

Under the new constitutional dispensation, the counties must seek the approval of central government in order for them to issue such bonds. That will be a great idea...especially in light of what's going on in China at the moment.

The Chinese government has banned the local authorities/counties from borrowing funds in the market or from banks. They are now realising that the projects, for which the funds are sourced for, are unable to generate enough revenue to repay the interest/principal.

The prospectus for each of the past three (plus the current) infrastructure bonds provide details of where they are funding. So far, the focus is on electricity generation/transmission, construction of roads, water and sewerage treatment facilities.

The Government had to step in to guarantee all the infrastructure bonds. I doubt if the revenue from these projects could be sufficient for interest/principal payments.

Regards
Scubidu
#29 Posted : Monday, August 23, 2010 7:45:29 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 9/4/2009
Posts: 700
Location: Nairobi
@emlyn. That concept of the tranches for bonds is interesting because credit rating agencies in international markets had a hard time assigning a credit rating on them b4 the financial crisis, non? Did CFC ever get a credit rating cos that's would have helped? But if it's unsecured paper, one would be buying on the strength of the group but now that they're no longer married, it's a whole new dynamic, non? Is it less riskier now than b4? (you don't have to answer all the questions, I'm just thinking out loud).

Ta. very much scoobs. So if they could use the Chinese model it would be great for the deepening of the market (our greedy stockbrokers-a lot of captive business). Incidentally research shows that intermediaries are a cheaper option to bank syndications. But like kizee mentioned a municipal bond would be backed by the municipality (not GOK gauranteed right). So we're trusting kanjo to pay us back?

By the way is there an implicit agreement between Kenya and Chinese on what happens when they finish a road. These guys are not going home! Here illegally like them Ethiopian dudes (only they have money). I hear they're buying up land in places like Karen (and have malizad most of the stray guwi in Nai already, whoa).

But if we look at the four IFRB and their projects. They specifically mention three sectors (1) Roads (23.3 bn so far expected 6.1 bn more), (2) Energy (15.9 bn already;expected 17.2 bn more) and (3) Water&Sewage (12 bn so far;expected 8.4 bn more). So from all four bonds they'd raise say 84.7 bn and the average interest rate (considering the tax exemptions) is about 9.75%, so we're looking at interest payments of say 8.2 bn pa. But like you said some of these projects may not result in tangible revenue (unless it's implied in higher revenue, e.g., KEnTRaco & GDA investments boosting KenGen's revenues). So quantifying gains on infrastructure seems difficult; A private sector player would be asked for a payback period?

The only road project mentioned is Thika. The only water projects were 229 water supply systems and 200 boreholes and only energy project were KenTraco & GDA activities. The rest was kind vague, with no particular timeline. I don't even think they have to stick to any promise, because funding is funding. If Safcom wants to issue a bond to part-finance dividends then it's all just funding; the govt can do the same.
“We are the middle children of history man, no purpose or place. We have no great war, no great depression. Our great war is a spiritual war, our great depression is our lives!" – Tyler Durden
Sasha
#30 Posted : Tuesday, August 24, 2010 9:12:36 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 9/5/2007
Posts: 627
@Kizee: The counties will be responsible for the services offered to the inhabitants of the counties e.g. water, sewerage, street lighting, road repairs etc. It will be their prerogative to improve the wellbeing of those who dwell in their counties. As Scooby says, they will have to seek approval from the central government if they wish to raise capital via bond issues.

@Scooby: Good insight! Chinas municipals were overambitious. They wanted to raise a lot of money and pay high coupons to ensure the bonds were oversubscribed. After the issue they expanded the scope of the projects without factoring in the coupons they had to pay. When the projects conked out, and they were unable to keep the payments going out, the government had to step in.

For SA and US, they issue municipals to finance activities such as mains services (electricity and street lighting, water and sewerage, heating etc). They can easily pay the coupons from the revenue generated. They don't go building new towns like China are doing. That is why it works for them.

I wonder if we can trust a kajora to take up such a bond!
Scooby
#31 Posted : Tuesday, August 24, 2010 4:29:06 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 9/2/2006
Posts: 121
@scubidu and Sasha

Ideally I do agree that local authorities should guarantee their local debts as is the case in other countries.

But the reality in Kenya is something totally different. That's the reason why the central government has to step in to guarantee the bond.

Am thinking that the new constitutional order will ensure more professionalism and accountability in the management of local authorities, or in this case counties.

The question is whether we all think that will be the case. So far, no one thinks that will ever happen.


emlyn ngwiri
#32 Posted : Tuesday, August 24, 2010 5:19:49 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 8/12/2010
Posts: 129
Location: nairobi
hi guys sorry for the silance kiazi mingi,

@scubidu the senior subordinated cfc stanbic bond would not have a fixed and a floating rate of intersst if it were not using the tranche system of payment of interest to investors.With an option to invest on either a fixed or floating rate basis, the pricing for the first part stands at 175 basis points over the seven year bond.

This is the first tranche of a $64 million, capital raising exercise being undertaken by CFC Stanbic Bank. The net proceeds will be channeled towards general corporate purposes, liquidity and capital management as well as future growth of the bank, particularly its home loans portfolio.


we know very well that bonds have to be rated to establish their creditworthiness and so fitch rated the cfc stsnbic bond as BB+ which, according to them was distinctly speculative.

The balance of the capital raised is likely to be a combination of Tier II and senior debt and is expected to be raised within the next 12 months in the same market.a tier II implies that it could use Subordinated or revaluation reserves.

the tranche system works in both ways- in times of liquidation of the asset the senior tranche gets payment first befor any other creditor and when interst payments are made.

emlyn
Scubidu
#33 Posted : Tuesday, September 14, 2010 11:05:29 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 9/4/2009
Posts: 700
Location: Nairobi
Kenya’s capital markets is set for a jolt as the Government floats a Sh10 billion university bond early next year to help higher learning institutions raise much needed funds to admit more students.

Higher Education Minister William Ruto said that the university bond whose details are being finalised by Treasury will be guaranteed by the government, opening a new financing avenue for public universities.

“We are finalising deliberations with the treasury in enabling public universities raise capital through a university bond at between six and eight per cent rather than the market rates of 18 per cent,” said the minister.

Read more:

http://www.businessdaily.../0/-/2glfsi/-/index.html
“We are the middle children of history man, no purpose or place. We have no great war, no great depression. Our great war is a spiritual war, our great depression is our lives!" – Tyler Durden
Scooby
#34 Posted : Thursday, September 16, 2010 6:39:28 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 9/2/2006
Posts: 121
Hi Scubidu,

Thanks for the update...

Might you have more details regarding the Housing Finance bond that is supposed to be issued this month?
Scubidu
#35 Posted : Thursday, September 16, 2010 8:43:07 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 9/4/2009
Posts: 700
Location: Nairobi
@scooby. Unfortunately no. Will ask my contacts. I suppose it'll be long term, 25 perhaps, 200bp premium?

Do you know anything about the new CBK rules on the bond bidding system....I heard that it was rejected jana. I don't understand what was going on. You know how it works?
“We are the middle children of history man, no purpose or place. We have no great war, no great depression. Our great war is a spiritual war, our great depression is our lives!" – Tyler Durden
Scooby
#36 Posted : Wednesday, September 22, 2010 5:16:57 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 9/2/2006
Posts: 121
Hi scubidu,

I finally managed to get a PDF copy of the Housing Finance Information Memorandum. You can get it from their website.

As for the "new" bidding system, what CBK is aiming to let the market determing the coupon rate for a particular bond issue. For instance, for a 2 year bond, the coupon rate for the bond issued in January 2010 was 8%. Now, investors have to let CBK know what rate they would like to be paid.

The big fuss with the bond traders, and their push for the system to be rejectd, is that there is too much liquidity in the market. Hence, this will lead to instances where the proposed rate could be much lower than the "ideal" rate.

I don't think the system can be rejected as it has been used in the March 2010 auction of the same bond.

Hope this helps!
Scubidu
#37 Posted : Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:01:09 AM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 9/4/2009
Posts: 700
Location: Nairobi
@scooby. What did you think of the 2 year auction? Well look at what the bidding has done to the other 2 year papers. Haven't they messed up secondary liquidity?.

Results for the auction:

http://www.centralbank.g...onds/manualresults.aspx

Yeah was looking at the HF IM jana. Noticed how generous the arrangers were in giving a 300bp premium but considering they're raising 175% their core capital, it's reasonable. Plus SCBK is one of the arrangers.

Interesting scenario though. They had 2 billion in lines of credit by H1 and leveraging further to 7 billion. Whereas equity is just over 4 billion. Have we been presented with this scenario before where debt is almost 50% of customer deposits?

Curious is that it's also unsubordinate debt. I had a debate on this forum once on the impact subordinate debt had on supplementary capital. What are the rules that apply to unsubordinate debt?
“We are the middle children of history man, no purpose or place. We have no great war, no great depression. Our great war is a spiritual war, our great depression is our lives!" – Tyler Durden
Scooby
#38 Posted : Friday, September 24, 2010 11:45:27 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 9/2/2006
Posts: 121
Hi Scubidu,

Regarding the 2 year bond issue, now you understand the fears that they have. I believe that the obsession by CBK with reducing interest rates is punish banks for not reducing their lending rates and/or increasing lending to the private sector.

If I were an investor, I would rather stay out of the market till sanity returns...there is no way am investing in products where the risk premium is too small/negligible for the risk you are taking or you are getting a negative real rate of return.

When looking at the HF Information Memorandum, did you get the impression that small investors are not welcome. Should the issue be oversubscribed, any investor who applied for Kshs. 100 million and above will receive their full share.

For sub ordinated, banks can be allowed to include it as part of their Tier II capital. If it has a duration of 5 years or more, then the entire amount can be allowed. Otherwise, it is prorated for lower durations.

Of note, if you look at the proposed requirements for Basel III, banks will be discouraged from this practise.

Regards
Scubidu
#39 Posted : Saturday, September 25, 2010 3:56:17 PM
Rank: Veteran


Joined: 9/4/2009
Posts: 700
Location: Nairobi

Yup I agree the risk premium is inadequate and the issue with the cut-off rate...the dividend yield on an index linked fund would give you more or less the same as a two year.

I'm guessing Treasury will fill up it's quota of borrowing for this budget before the end of the year then stay out of primaries next year. But it's taking a tole if the recent 91D undersub is anything to go by.

As for HF, yup it's not targeting retailers, but it won't be liquid enuf for secondary. The only coupon that makes any sense in the primaries is the fixed one (much like CFC in 2009), but what about the greater impact on finance costs? But the valuation on the fixed coupon is far more attractive than it's equity counterpart.

I thot sub debt contribution to capital also depended on a bank's debt to tier 1 capital ratio? Or else wouldn't all banks be tempted to raise capital this way?
“We are the middle children of history man, no purpose or place. We have no great war, no great depression. Our great war is a spiritual war, our great depression is our lives!" – Tyler Durden
Scooby
#40 Posted : Tuesday, September 28, 2010 5:37:06 PM
Rank: Member


Joined: 9/2/2006
Posts: 121
Hi Scubidu,

There are two components of capital for a bank

Tier I - which is mainly made up of share capital (including share premium), retained earnings and preference share capital

Tier II - which would include such items as subordinated debt and general provisions.

Most financial institutions would prefer to issue subordinated debt to share capital due to the message it wants to send to the market.

For instance, HF had earlier indicated that they would either issue more shares or debt this year. There was a feeling that investors would be fatiqued by another rights issue after the one they did in 2008. Thats what you saw with the KCB rights issue - hence it was under subscribed.

Hope this helps.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages<1234>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2024 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.