Spend.thrift wrote:Check Chapter 13 (13.5) of that doc for matters condom use and you will discover you are the one who is dwelling on prevalence. I am not fighting you. I am just disturbed when I listen to radio shows run by mangoes who take things out of context not because they want to but because our media houses are full of people who know nothing apart from reading scripts and thereby mislead the public.
For the record that 40% figure is wrong.
I get angrier when people like you happily amplify the spurious noises from those classics and kisses.
I maintain that a KIMC diploma, "celebrity status", a pretty (brown) face or the ability to make people laugh should not be the sole qualifications for people to be entrusted with so much opinion and access to the ears of the greater public. It's like giving a monkey an automatic rifle and hoping they will only fire into the air.
Remember we are living in the information age-yet the media thrives on the information edge, just about to fall off.
Umenena kama watu 6!
@ Nostopping ... Before you accept the study report you should understand how they were collected. KDHS is from random cluster sampling and therefore gives a better estimate and is less prone to bias.
While the indicator survey relies heavily on sentinel site surveillance which are usually hospital and antenatal clinics which gives a biased estimate and it is biased towards an overestimate!
Pole for the dressing down lakini hapo umejiexpose ati prevalence of 18%
Kenya is not south Africa and it has never been that high!